Skip to main content

About your Search

20120925
20121003
LANGUAGE
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4 (some duplicates have been removed)
Current
Sep 26, 2012 10:00pm PDT
susan rice went on talk shows and had a different story, watch. >> soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in benghazi. we believe it looks like extremist elements individuals joined in testify that fort with heavy weapons, and it spun from there into something much much more violent. >> cenk: so she appears to be saying not necessarily a terrorist attack. it spun out of control. that looked questionable right from the get-go and jay carney on september 20th came out and said it is i think, self-evident up in smoke? a catastrophically embarrassing way. to lose an entire consulate, and basically be run out of town and we have learned that there were at least two dozen cia agents also in benghazi. so there was a huge loss of our intelligence out there as well. so those two things are the main reason why i think they have been trying to paper it over. and the final point, al quada. we were told that all of the fierce were overblown, and now we have people saying al-qaeda was involved. and then you have questions, who armed al-qaeda? was this part of the
Current
Sep 26, 2012 9:00pm PDT
because we know it was terrorist attack and yet for nine days, susan rice and others went out and said this was spontaneous mob violence related to. >>tube clip. we know that's not true. why was susan rice out on the sunday shows making those statements and trying to cover up what actually happened. that's the real question to look at here. >> jennifer: right. it seems like you're talking about two different obviously incidents. one is the egyptian embassy and the one is the libyan compound. there were two different things but the question i think is -- on everybody's mind is it is always difficult when you have an international incident to speak too soon. that probably could be said of the administration as well as of governor romney before he had gathered all of the facts. i guess the question that many people have is it proper to be criticizing an administration in the middle of a crisis? >> well, look, we're in the middle of a presidential campaign and the foreign policy is something that's critical to to be discussed. it is going to be discussed by the white house. it's going
Current
Oct 3, 2012 6:00am PDT
things out. >> for many calls for ambassador of the u.n., susan rice to resign after going on all of the talk shows and pushing this youtube video as the reason -- >> i watched the presentation and i thought it was -- amazing. that someone in her position would go on with that degree of certainty. that fast. and that authoritatively. and be that wrong. her presentation was demonstrated to be inaccurate within a matter of hours. >> stephanie: can you imagine? >> it has got to be embarrassing. >> stephanie: cheese and crackers jim. can you imagine someone going forward with inaccurate information. we know where the weapons are. >> make sure he knows what they may not know. >> stephanie: we know where the weapons are. they're east and west. we know where the wmd are. >> i have a map right here. hold on. i drew it on a napkin. >> stephanie: can you imagine some idiot shooting off his mouth? >> imagine going to war without sufficient body armor? >> did he not understand the irony of what exactly he was saying to greta van susteren? >> stephanie: the point is -- >> nonironnic ironies and i
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4 (some duplicates have been removed)